Creative Concepts of Architecture Activities
  
DOI.org/10.5281/zenodo.1294107

Potapenko A. 

ANASTASIIA POTAPENKO, Postgraduate, e-mail: aap.arch@mail.ru
Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, School of Engineering
Far Eastern Federal University
8 Sukhanova St., Vladivostok, Russia, 690091   

Analysis of the effectiveness of the territorial organisation
of the Shkot Peninsula, Vladivostok

Abstract: This article deals with the work on revealing the spatial development reserves of the Shkot Peninsula within the territorial communication model of the city by the method of matrixes of spatial disproportions. The measure of the effectiveness of the spatial organisation of a city within the framework of this model is the choice: the space-time availability of activities, social contacts, benefits, and services. The objectives of the study are to determine the indices of the effectiveness of the territorial organisation of the peninsula: population density, intensity of use, transport accessibility; clustering of territories according to the levels of town-planning organisation, revealing the disproportions of spatial development; the determination of the directions of spatial development of the territories of the Shkot Peninsula as well as development of recommendations to improve the structural and functional effectiveness of the territorial organisation of the Shkot Peninsula. The results of the study can be further used to develop and monitor documents for the territorial planning of the city and the improvement of the quality of life of people to be achieved by eliminating the pre-existing disproportions in the development of territories.
Key words: spatial organization of the city, territorial efficiency, territorial-communication model, city model, pre-project analysis.

REFERENCES
1.Anikeev V.V. Vladivostok entered the XXI century: Urban planning aspects of city development. Vladivostok, FEFU, 2011, 200 p.
2.Baevsky O.A. Place and role of urban planning in urban development: traditions and innovations. Architecture and construction of Moscow. 2009(546);4:6–11.
3.Viktorova M.V. Revealing reserves the spatial development of the city (on an example of Ufa). Moscow, HSE, 2014.
4.Vysokovskyi А.А. Land use and development rules: a development guide. Experience of introducing legal zoning in Kyrgyzstan. Bishkek, 2005, 326 p.
5.Gashenko A.Ye., Pashnina Yu.P., Chekmeneva E.A. Automation of town planning studies in educational practice (using the example of parametric modeling). Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2015;3.
6.Gutnov A.E. Evolution of Urban Development. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 1984.
7.Kanin D.M., Parinova L.V., Lvovich I.Ya. Information technologies as a tool for intellectualization of management of sustainable development of the territory. Information and Security. 2013(16);1.
8.Melnikov A.A., Donguzov K.A., Aznabayeva L.R. Urban infrastructure development management system Smart city. Archiort. 2015;1.
9.Potapenko A.A., Krasnov D.A., Moore V.K. Computational methods in the pre-design analysis of the spatial structure of Vladivostok. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2017(38);1:315–328.
10.Tarasova L.G. The role of documents of territorial planning of large cities in the development of their self-development processes. Bulletin of Volgograd State Architectural and Construction University. Series: Construction and architecture. 2009;15:195–201. 
11.Trubina E.G. City in theory: the experiences of understanding the space. Moscow, New Literary Review, 2013, 520 p.
12.Trutnev E. Urban regulation: Bases of regulation of city-planning activity in conditions 
of formation of the real estate market. M., Fund Institute of Urban Economics, 2007, 97 p.