Biryukov D., Biryukov Yu., Lebedkin A.

DMITRY BIRYUKOV, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Head of Training Laboratory, Department of Fortification and Special Facilities, e-mail: b_d_v0402@mail.ru

YURI BIRYUKOV, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Senior Lecturer, Department of Hydraulic Structures, Building Structures and Solid Mechanics, e-mail: uabiryukov@mail.ru

ANATOLY LEBEDKIN, Engineer, Department of Technology, Organization and Economics of Construction, e-mail: lebedkin.86@bk.ru
Military Institute (Engineering and Technical)
Military Academy of Material and Technical Support named after General of the Army A.V. Khrulev
8 Makarova nab, St. Petersburg, Russia, 199034

Improving the methods for assessment of construction-in-progress facilities of the military infrastructure taking into account their technical condition

Abstract: The article presents the results of the study of methods and approaches for assessing uncompleted construction objects taking into account their technical condition. It contains a survey of various factors which may affect decision-making in matters concerning their further use. The authors present various approaches to determine the value of the uncompleted construction objects and to provide a clear description of such objects according to a number of definite parameters which take into consideration the technical condition of each, the degree of their preparedness, the period of their being in caretaker status, etc. The survey of research works highlights the need for improvements in the existing methods of assessing uncompleted construction objects as well as those of evaluating the variants of their sale. The authors present the basic approaches to the method they develop of assessing the uncompleted construction objects of military infrastructure and the measures to improve the existing techniques. They determine the consistence of resolution of the problem to define the main criteria for assessing the options for the disposition of objects of uncompleted construction of military infrastructure for the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. The main criteria that most fully disclose the specificity of uncompleted construction objects of military infrastructure including special purpose facilities have been identified and allow assessing the options for the disposition of these objects within power structures and security services.

Keywords: construction, assessment, uncompleted construction, object parameters, effectiveness of investments, sales criteria.

REFERENCES

1.      Baykovskaya A.V. Analysis of efficiency of investment in the unfinished building. Strategic management analysis. 2014;6:8–14.

2.      Beshelev S.D., Gurvich F.G. Mathematical and statistical methods of expert assessments. M., Statistics, 1974, 159 p.

3.      Biryukov A.N., Biryukov Y.A. Definition of a technical condition of buildings in areas of armed conflict. Actual problems of protection and security: proceedings of the XIX all-Russian scientific-practical conference raran, 4–7 April 2016. Vol. 7, part 3: Problems of organization of material-technical provision of military security Publication of the Russian Academy of rocket and artillery Sciences. Moscow, 2016, p. 35–48.

4.      Biryukov A.N., Kulikov D.N., Toporov A.V. Determination of territorial correction factors used in the calculation of standard costs for the provision of public services. Military Engineer. 2017;1:3–7.

5.      Biryukov A.N., Lazarev A.N., Marugin V.M., Moroz A.V., Chmyrev V.A. Expert forms of quality control and current state of construction objects: monograph. St.Petersburg, Polytechnic publishing house, 2012, 213 p.

6.      Gorodnova N.V., Baykovskaya A.V. Methodical approach to the evaluation of the completion date of the construction of public-private partnerships. Strategic management analysis. 2011;3:14–19.

7.      Gudz Yu.V., Kremer I.V., Proshin Yu.M., Cherkashin L.P., Shiyanov A.V. Features of work on safe shutdown for a long period (conservation) of hazardous production facilities. Development of documentation and its examination. Proceedings of the Kuban state University. 2015;10:198–203.

8.      Zilberova I.Yu., Petrov K.S. The problem of reconstruction of residential buildings from various periods of construction. Engineering Journal of Don. 2012;4. URL: http://ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n4p1y2012/1119. – 21.05.2018.

9.      Kozlovskaya M.A. Co-investment of completion of objects of incomplete production: autoref. dis. ... Cand. Econ. Sciences'. M., ed. house State. University of Management, 2008, 17 p.

10. Medyanik Yu.V. Problems of classification and assessment of real estate construction in progress. J. of Russian Entrepreneurship. 2014;19:157–167.

11. The method of cost effectiveness evaluation for unfinished investment projects, which were (are) fully or partially financed from the regional budget, directed to capital investments on objects that are not transferred to the Federal or municipal property (resolution of the Government of the Samara Region of March 3, 2014, N 116).

12. Nikishina O.V., Nikishin I.V., Buzheev Yu.V. Economic efficiency of investments in objects under construction. Bulletin of Irkutsk State Technical University. 2013;10:344–350.

13. Nikishina O.V., Nikishin I.V. Criteria of efficiency of investments in objects of incomplete construction. Problems of management of social and economic development of regions of Siberia. 2012,
p. 54–62.

14. Osmanov I.H. Mathematical model of distribution of funds in capital construction. CETERIS
PARIBUS. 2016;4:46–48.

15. Order of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation of May 19, 2014 N 278 “On the implementation of the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of September 13, 2010, N. 716 “On approval of the Rules for the formation and implementation of the Federal targeted investment program" (as amended on March 24, 2018)”.

16. Pylayeva A.V., Kolchenko O.V. Practice of application of approaches and methods of assessment in determination of cadastral cost of real estate. Regional Economy: theory and practice. 2015;16:24–33.

17. Rutkauskas T.K., Sapegin A.V. Method of attracting investors ' funds for completion of unfinished housing construction. Izvestiya USUE. 2010;2:57–64.